Comfyui vs automatic1111 reddit. bat runs as expected. For some workflows or steps in a complete workflow ComfyUI is better, for others SD-Next is better, so I would use both. at 0. By creating and connecting nodes that perform different parts of the process, you can run Stable Diffusion. At some point I also tested EasyDiffusion, but it was well, easy, nothing fancy. Don't know if inpainting works with SDXL, but ComfyUI inpainting works with SD 1. While kohya samples were very good comfyui tests were awful. But those structures it has prebuilt for you aren’t optimized for low end hardware specifically. I've moved from A1111 to ComfyUI, but one thing I'm really missing is the Restart sampler found in A1111. Upscaling is not perfect yet, you'll always lose some details or texture. I don't like the overhead as it harkens back to Automatic1111's clusterbomb of technical debt. Comfyui has this standalone beta build which runs on python 3. I've seen these posts about how automatic1111 isn't active and to switch to vlad repo. (changes seeds drastically; use CPU to produce the same picture across different videocard vendors; use NV to produce same picture as on NVidia videocards) It is true that A1111 and ComfyUI weight the prompts differently. Hi. ComfyUI on the other hand, if you got your hands on the fitting tutorials, gave me the possibility to generate a picture by combining multiple IP adapters with a regional prompt. If one really think Automatic1111 is not alive or people moved to ComfyUI, consider again whether you are living in a “filter bubble” made by this sub, with most mods being StabilityAI employees. Bunun genel sebebi olarak da yeni modellerin, yeni içeriklerin ComfyUI tarafında daha hızlı ilerlediğini, Automatic1111'in atıl kaldığını iddia ediyorlar. 1 Automatic 1111; 3. You will have to learn Stable Diffusion more deeply though. A1111 does a lot behind the scenes with prompts, while ComfyUI Doesn't, making it more sensitive to the Prompt length , sampler shouldn't affect but i always use Euler normal , try it out. A1111 has basic SD-XL support, but without huge internal changes it won't keep up with SD-Next and ComfyUI. We all know that prompt order matters - what you put at the beginning of a prompt is given more attention by the AI than what goes at the end. 11 s/it in Automatic1111, the peak VRAM is 4. Both work, but I don't want to duplicate resources. A1111 is like ComfyUI with prebuilt workflows and a GUI for easier usage. This doesn't tell me a whole lot and doesn't account for strict testing meaning it is essentially invalid. ComfyUI is also trivial to extend with custom nodes. 5 to 3 times faster than automatic1111. 2) and just gives weird results. It is said to be very easy and afaik can "grow" with you as you learn more skills ComfyUI + SD-Next (A1111 fork with much better handling of SD-XL and Diffusers in general) give you the most options. And nobody in their right mind use basic comfy inpainting nodes. Feb 23, 2023 · Why is there such big speed differences when generating between ComfyUI, Automatic1111 and other solutions? And why is it so different for each GPU? A friend of mine for example is doing this on a GTX 960 (what a madman) and he's experiencing up to 3 times the speed when doing inference in ComfyUI over Automatic's. Automatic1111 for multiple workflows and extensions. Hey guys! I need your help. ) Hello! For many months I have worked with automatic1111 and cagliostro UI (automatic1111 derivative with better UI + QOL improvements) These interfaces are both wonderful and extremely powerful however I find their bugginess extremely annoying in that I am constantly having errors in my sessions on colab or rundiffusion because of bugginess that is inate to automatic1111- after about 20-60 The most powerful and modular diffusion model GUI, api and backend with a graph/nodes interface. By combining various nodes in ComfyUI, you can create a workflow for generating images in Stable Diffusion. 3 its do 30 steps. My graphics card begins with a "2", you guys. Finally I gave up with ComfyUI nodes and wanted my extensions back in A1111. No negative prompt was used. In comfyui running same prompt as automatic1111…. They offer 20% extra credits to our readers. This is Reddit's home for Computer Role Playing Games, better known as the CRPG subgenre! CRPGs are characterized by the adaptation of pen-and-paper RPG, or tabletop RPGs, to computers (and later, consoles. If you installed your AUTOMATIC1111’s gui before 23rd January then the best way to fix it is delete /venv and /repositories folders, git pull latest version of gui from github and start it. After learning auto1111 for a week, I'm switching to Comfy due the rudimentary nature of extensions for everything and persisting memory issues with my 6GB GXT1660. I am happy with Foocus and Forge web UI. 5 but I've recently fired up ComfyUI to use SDXL. And the new interface is also an improvement as it's cleaner and tighter. here i have explained all in below videos for automatic1111 but in any case i am also planning to move Vladmandic for future videos since automatic1111 didnt approve any updates over 3 weeks now torch xformers below 1 : How To Install New DREAMBOOTH & Torch 2 On Automatic1111 Web UI PC For Epic Performance Gains Guide ComfyUI: An extremely powerful Stable Diffusion GUI with a graph/nodes interface for advanced users that gives you precise control over the diffusion process without coding anything now supports ControlNets Tested all of the Automatic1111 Web UI attention optimizations on Windows 10, RTX 3090 TI, Pytorch 2. So, you’ll find nodes to load a checkpoint model, take prompt inputs, save the output image, and more. He's just working on it on the dev branch instead of the main branch. last 2 on runpod but same thing works on pc since uses automatic1111 Ultimate Speed Test: ComfyUi vs Invoke ai vs Automatic1111 Table of Contents. While FooocusUI is super simple to use, stupid easy, it suffers from the fact that the creator make it too easy to use, its so dumbed down that its been stripped of all the things that make A1111 19. 2, it does 40 steps. With comfy you can optimize your stuff how you want. Overall, while both tools have their strengths and weaknesses, Automatic1111 is generally more user-friendly and accessible, while ComfyUI offers more flexibility and control for advanced users. I was facing similar issues when i first started using ComfyUI, try adjusting CFG scale to 5 and if your prompts are big like in A1111, add a token merging node. Still slow, about a minute per image, a couple of doing 60+ passes. This simple checkbox in the Automatic1111 WebUI interface I am not new to stable diffusion, i have been working months with automatic1111, but the recent updatesjust suck. Best: ComfyUI, but it has a steep learning curve Easiest-ish: A1111 might not be absolutely easiest UI out there, but that's offset by the fact that it has by far the most users - tutorials and help is easy to find Easiest: Check Fooocus. Automatic1111 installed. The process is faster, because is less complex. Jan 26, 2024 · Performance: ComfyUI is generally faster than Automatic1111 and is better suited for creating many images with a singular workflow. Next (Vladmandic), VoltaML, InvokeAI, and Fooocus. The performance is abysmal and it gets more sluggish with every day. In this article, we will be comparing the speed and performance of Comfy UI, Automatic 1111, and Invoke AI. I believe that to get similar images you need to select CPU for the Automatic1111 setting Random number generator source. Comfy has clearly taken a smart and logical approach with the workflow GUI, at least from a programmer's point of view. What I would like to do is just simply replicate the Restart sampler from A1111 in ComfyUI (to start with). Before making my post I decided to give the automatic1111 version a try And it has everything anyone could ever want! Easy setup, good documentation, high speed, high resolution, text files with the prompts, prompts matrix, in and out painting, upscaling, seamless tiles and even a prompt value ramp(use 1 prompt with variables like cfg scale /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper moderation, and exclude blind users from the site. It does everything I need much more easily than ComfyUI. You have to draw a mask, save the image with the mask, then upload to the UI again to inpaint. I don't do a lot of just prompt and run work (which ComfyUI) is just as good as if not much better at. Workflows are much more easily reproducible and versionable. Fooocus vs ComfyUI vs AUTOMATIC1111 ? Question - Help I am an absolute beginner in photo editing I have used some basic tools in photoshop and generative AI, I don't know which GUI to use, I will be mostly using inpaint, outpaint and text generation. So, you’re now familiar with all the features available in Fooocus. Aug 19, 2023 · Whenever you migrate from the Stable Diffusion webui known as automatic1111 to the modern and more powerful ComfyUI, you’ll be facing some issues to get started easily. Video seems to be more friendly in comfyUI, but I have managed it in Automatic1111 as well. if i put 200 steps, at 0. Mainly, a unified, simple to use inpainting ux and a strong prompting system. I think the noise is also generated differently where A1111 uses GPU by default and ComfyUI uses CPU by default, which makes using the same seed give different results. Should you use ComfyUI instead of AUTOMATIC1111? Here’s a comparison. Sames as Swin4R which details a lot the image. Just wondering if you as a Programmer found the programmatic aspects of modifying Automatic1111 or ComfyUI better for your purposes? We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Tested failed loras with a1111 they were great. A quality/performance comparison of the Fooocus image generation software vs Automatic1111 and ComfyUI. dev20230722+cu121, --no-half-vae, SDXL, 1024x1024 pixels. 2, it only does 20 steps. Lastly, inpainting in ComfyUI isn't much fun yet I may have to use this one for fixes. My guess -- and it's purely a guess -- is that ComfyUI wasn't using the best cross-attention optimization. 7. Either you use Invoke AI (the true superior inpainting/outpainting solution), or you use A1111 and any of their fo /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper moderation, and exclude blind users from the site. Genel olarak hem Stable Diffusion Youtube içeriklerinde hem de Reddit'te insanların Automatic1111'e burun kıvırıp ComfyUI kullanmaya başladığını görüyorum. And neither cmdr2/stable-diffusion-ui nor ComfyUI has the nice UI for previewing Loras or textual inversions based on an example image that Automatic1111 has. It will download everything again but this time the correct versions of pytorch, cuda drivers and xformers. We know A1111 was using xformers, but weren't told, as far as i noticed, what ComfyUI was using. Hello! Looking to dive into animatediff and am looking to learn from the mistakes of those that walked the path before me🫡🙌🫡🙌🫡🙌🫡🙌 Are people using… Compare the features and drawbacks of Invokeai and automatic1111, two popular tools for stable diffusion. I did two things to have ComfyUI glom on to Automatic1111 (write up: AI Art with ComfyUI and Stable Diffusion SDXL — Day Zero Basics For an Automatic1111 User | by Eric Richards | Jul, 2023 | Medium) Automatic1111 is giving me 18-25it/s vs invokes 12-17ish it/s. ComfyUI also uses xformers by default, which is non-deterministic. 5 and 2. Like doing this : (close up:3) Just gets weird artifacts. 1. I love automatic1111 and it’s great fun to connect to your pc and use it on the phone, but using it on mobile has two big drawbacks: The input box and generate button are at the top, and you have to scroll down to view the results. 4 it/s I am completely new to this and wondering what the difference between A1111, controlNet, and comfyUI are? I know comfyUI and A1111 are GUIs but is there any significant difference between all three. Also, ComfyUI got the latest developments in Stable Diffusion AI (like Stable Cascade), while the implementation in A1111 comes later. 0 that ads controlnet and a node based backend that you can use for plugins etc so seems a big teams finally taking node based expansion serious i love comfy but a bigger team and really nice ui with node plugin support gives serious potential to them… wonder if comfy and invoke will somehow work together or if things will stay fragmented between all the various 10 votes, 14 comments. 1) in A1111. The checkpoint model was SDXL Base v1. And the clever tricks discovered from using ComfyUI will be ported to the Automatic1111-WebUI. It seems a proccess similar to the one we can find in the EXTRAS Menu in Automatic1111 or the upscaling nodes in ComfyUI. And it's 2. I have a few questions though. In Auto1111, SD processes the prompts in chunks of 75 tokens. ComfyUI installed. I often get artifacts and weird blotches. xFormers with Torch 2. I trained a Lora on a person and the images generated in Automatic 1111 look exactly like the person. I used automatic1111 last year with my 8gb gtx1080 and could usually go up to around 1024x1024 before running into memory issues. File run_nvidia_gpu. Multiple step workflow can be instantly resumed and backup in comfyui, worflow that would require several A1111 tabs with settings that can't be properly resumed outside doing it manually. However, automatic1111 is still actively updating and implementing features. comfyUI takes 1:30s, auto1111 is taking over 2:05s so, wanted to ask, is it just me or others are facing the same performance issues with auto1111? Welcome to the unofficial ComfyUI subreddit. Shrug, guess it's what you need done and which you are comfortable with and prefer. Got a 12gb 6700xt, set up the AMD branch of automatic1111, and even at 512x512 it runs out of memory half the time. Most of my work is inpainting, upscaling, Krita editing, rerunning, and model swapping to get very exact results. Run it on a ryzen + amd system. using img2img, if I put 100 steps, but have denoising strength at 0. This tutorial explains what Automatic1111 is, what ComfyUI is, and the main differences between them. I no longer use automatic unless I want to play around with Temporal kit. Here are some examples I did generate using comfyUI + SDXL 1. (and a small commission to support this site if you sign up) ComfyUI vs AUTOMATIC1111. ComfyUI vs Automatic1111 Comfyui is much better suited for studio use than other GUIs available now. A lot of newcomers to ComfyUI are coming from much simpler interfaces like AUTOMATIC1111, InvokeAI, or SD. Went back to automatic1111. I have been watching videos on InbokeAI for the last couple of weeks, and it seems to be overall a much more polished version of Automatic1111, which much better inpainting and outpainting, however, it seems to lack X/Y plot which I use pretty much every time to compare results between models, and I heard it might not be compatible with every model out there. Their unified canvas is awesome too. I'd recommend studying their prompting system and keywords. I am still unsure what controlNet is for but I see multiple vid2vids on YT using it with other stuff and just curious if anyone can fill me in on Nov 26, 2023 · Automatic1111からComfyUIへの移行で手間取った点を備忘録として残します。少しずつ移行して行く予定なのでその都度更新します。 ComfyUIのダウンロードや基本的なGUIの説明は以下サイトが参考になります。 【Stable Diffusion】ComfyUIとは?インストール方法と基本的な使い方について | イクログ (ikuriblog Hello! I'm learning ComfyUI vs automatic1111 and saw the AP 6 ultra uber mega workflow and was wondering where people sat on it. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. 11. Invoke has a far superior ui and I like how it displays a history of all my outputs with the seed and prompt data ready to “rewind” any mistakes I make. . full denoising usually makes it use the full amount of I've been using Automatic1111, and I've managed to do some programmatic things with it, kinda a pain and for myself, the UI always feels like a pain for me to use. Then i tested my previous loras with comfyui they sucked also. What's the propuse of the usage ComfyUI or Automatic1111 only? Can anyone enlight me about this? By the way, I'm new to this AI programs and I'm still learning Stable Diffusion. If you run into install problems, just reboot PC, and it finishes. Please share your tips, tricks, and workflows for using this software to create your AI art. The more complex the workflows get (e. 35 s/it in comfyui, the peak VRAM is 4. The video was pretty interesting, beyond the A1111 vs. AUTOMATIC1111 is the de facto GUI for Stable Diffusion. Mar 21, 2024 · ComfyUI and Automatic1111 Stable Diffusion WebUI are two open-source applications that enable you to generate images with diffusion models. true. Is there a reason. Comfyui is more fit to be used in a production environment than A1111. It's still 30 seconds slower than comfyUI with the same 1366x768 resolution and 105 steps. Feb 24, 2024 · In ComfyUI, there are nodes that cover every aspect of image creation in Stable Diffusion. - comfyanonymous/ComfyUI /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper moderation, and exclude blind users from the site. I found ComfyUI_restart_sampling custom node, but it's a bit more complicated. I do like that Comfy has everything disabled by default, and can save workflows, but automatic1111 offers the same save capabilities. The big current advantage of ComfyUI over Automatic1111 is it appears to handle VRAM much better. 5 perfectly well but not Automatic1111 SDXL while ComfyUI does. I'm an Automatic1111 user for SD1. 1+cu118 is about 3. For instance (word:1. Next. What's the diffirence between them. TLDRSpeed great, features great, ease of use of the charts, control net functionality flawless, install kind of clunky. VFX artists are also typically very familiar with node based UIs as they are very common in that space. 0. 3 Comfy UI; SD Next vs Automatic 1111; Conclusion; FAQ; Article Introduction. Most of them already are if you are using the DEV branch by the way. The TensorRT unet stuff recently released for Automatic1111 is pretty cool (not sure if it is out for ComfyUI yet?) Speeds up generation x2, I can make an SDXL image image in 6. Scoured the internet and came across multiple posts saying to add the arguments --xformers --medvram. 2 Invoke AI; 3. When ComfyUI came out, the developer knew that many people had Automatic1111 already, so the install instructions included how to share the same directory of models. Major features: settings tab rework: add search field, add categories, split UI settings page into many Apr 21, 2024 · In the meantime, I play with ComfyUI for new things, even though a node-based workflow is not my personal choice. As far as I can tell, how prompt weighting is handled is one of the key differences between ComfyUI and A1111 (A1111 does some kind of normalization I think). ComfyUI x4 upscalers. If there is someone who will help me out my journey on this technology, i'll appreciate it! Using ComfyUI was a better experience the images took around 1:50mns to 2:25mns 1024x1024 / 1024x768 all with the refiner. But how does it actually compare to the likes of Automatic1111 or ComfyUI? Here’s a detailed comparison table outlining the differences and similarities between Fooocus, Automatic1111, and ComfyUI. Hi all! We are introducing Stability Matrix - a free and open-source Desktop App to simplify installing and updating Stable Diffusion Web UIs. That is the important thing. Here's a comparison. ) Automatic1111 Web UI - PC - Free Automatic1111 Stable Diffusion DreamBooth Guide: Optimal Classification Images Count Comparison Test 20. So, i am eager to switch to comfyUI, which is so far much more optimized. One thing I noticed right away when using Automatic1111 is that the processing time is taking a lot longer. I'm unsure if setting A1111 Emphasis mode (in Settings - Stable Diffusion) to 'No Norm' will fix this, but seems worth a try. And it runs Automatic1111 1. So from that aspect, they'll never give the same results unless you set A1111 to use the CPU for the seed. But these arguments did not work for me, --xformers gave me a minor bump in performance (8s/it vs 11s/it) but still taking about 10mins per image. I've put in the --xformers launch command but can't get it working with my AMD card. Maybe I am doing it wrong, but ComfyUI inpainting is a bit awkward to use. Introduction; Test Setup; Performance Comparison 3. 1 - LDSR upscaler or more powerful upscaler: Saw a different grade of details upscaling in Automatic1111 vs. I find Invoke to be faster for face fix and upscalers as it's less patched together and can execute multiple operations at the time of generation, but for pushing out large batches Auto does seem to be faster. Lacks the extension and other functionalities, but is amazing if all you need to do is generate images. To be completely fair, I haven't used all my old extensions from automatic1111 yet, but the ones I have tried work nicely. Do you tend to use smaller workflows and pass the images between them or one design one mega workflow with a lot of toggles and options? I don't have a premium setup(1 It seems that Upscayl only uses a upscaling model, so there is no difussion involved and the result will depend only on the upscaling model. I find that much faster. I realize one shouldn’t go that high with the multiplier. Fooocus / Fooocus-MRE / RuinedFooocus - quick image generation, and simple and easy to use GUI (Based on the Comfy backend). With integrated graphics, it goes cpu only and sucks. It's like they generate weird stuff and don't really follow prompts Edit2: A lot of people have said "it works fine on my machine, I have a 3060 with 12 GB of ram" and let me be the first to tell you not everyone has a modern gaming rig. It also seems like ComfyUI is way too intense on using heavier weights on (words:1. I have no idea what runs under the hood which makes it faster than automatic1111. I would like to see some nice features from Foocus to be implemented into Forge web UI, like ready styles, upscaling, inpainting (which is very efficient and handy), face swap, and style For those not familiar with it, here is how it's described here: . 5 seconds now (with no Loras on a 3090) there is the 10-20 min wait to convert each model, but it is worth it to do your favorites. I think for me at least for now with my current laptop using comfyUI is the way to go. Dec 19, 2023 · In ComfyUI, every node represents a different part of the Stable Diffusion process. Mar 22, 2024 · One of the first features that users look for when transitioning from Automatic1111 WebUI to ComfyUI is the “Hires Fix” feature. I've been using Automatic1111 until some update lowered speed on old cards (GTX1660), then I had a break from SD, recently I tried ComfyUI, speed is great, but I feel lack of plenty of ease-of-use and workflow features Automatic1111 has. I don't think that even required a meeting, it was just common sense. Will be interesting seeing LDSR ported to comfyUI OR any other powerful upscaler. I wont use comfyUI either because there are too many options for workflows and it leads to "the paradox of choice" which causes me to hate using it. I'm currently using Automatic on a MAC OS, but having numerous problems. 1) in ComfyUI is much stronger than (word:1. It's looking like spam lately. Please keep posted images SFW. multiple LoRas, negative prompting, upscaling), the more Comfy results I always use the highres fix and use the highest resolution I can get before it crashes, the bigger the original image is, the less detail you will lose when you upscale it. so i think the denoising settings can affect how many steps it actually uses. I am fairly new to using Stable Diffusion, first generating images on Civitai, then ComfyUI and now I just downloaded the newest version of Automatic1111 webui. im using the HLKY fork and ive noticed the steps it uses arent always what you put into the UI. ComfyUI uses the CPU for seeding, A1111 uses the GPU. ) Automatic1111 Web UI - PC - Free Epic Web UI DreamBooth Update - New Best Settings - 10 Stable Diffusion Training Compared on RunPods. to me Comfy feels like something better suited for post processing instead of image generation there is no point using a node based UI for just generating a image but layering different models for upscale or feature refinement is the main reason comfy is actually good after the image generation part, atm using Loras and TIs is a PITA not to mention a lack of basic /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper moderation, and exclude blind users from the site. Comfy speed comparison. Prompt: a frightened 30 year old woman in a futuristic spacesuit runs through an alien jungle from a terrible huge ugly monster against the background of two moons. May 7, 2024 · Fooocus vs Automatic1111 vs ComfyUI. g. I use openvino on my an Intel I-5 1st gen laptop. On my 12GB 3060, A1111 can't generate a single SDXL 1024x1024 image without using RAM for VRAM at some point near the end of generation, even with --medvram set. Invoke just released 3. 23 GB Also, no offense but we should take the relative aggressive user group of comfyui into consideration when choosing software Hopefully, some of the most important extensions such as Adetailer will be ported to ComfyUI. If I understand correctly, these are just frontend UIs for what is essentially the same core backend, although Automatic1111 has more access to more external features. I checked on the GitHub and it appears there are a huge number of outstanding issues and not many recent commits. I really want to use InvokeAI but I can't seem to get my imported models working correctly. Jul 6, 2024 · Check out Think Diffusion for a fully managed ComfyUI online service. Automatic1111 vs ComfyUI on infinite tokens, trying to replicate A1111 prompts on Comfy /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open Nobody ever thought that Comfy Inpainting was even good to start with. However, if you wish to spend time carefully fixing and enhancing the details of a single image, Automatic1111 might be more suitable. /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper moderation, and exclude blind users from the site. And I got it working. Automatic1111 is significantly faster though. But in auto1111 it renders fine. 35 GB I get 2. Most (>95%) recent images on CivitAI are from Automatic1111 format, not ComfyUI. I get 2. It also doesn't match up with quite a number of people making comments today disputing this claim as they've also tested ComfyUI vs Automatic1111 and found it to be essentially the same performance. ComfyUI has supplied directions Nov 7, 2023 · I consistently get much better results with Automatic1111's webUI compared to ComfyUI even for seemingly identical workflows. 0 with refiner. Asked reddit wtf is going on everyone blindly copy pasted the same thing over and over. Noted that the RC has been merged into the full release as 1. Currently, you can use our one-click install with Automatic1111, Comfy UI, and SD. ComfyUI VS AUTOMATIC1111. Join the discussion on Reddit. “(Composition) will be different between comfyui and a1111 due to various reasons”. Images from Lora trained on a person do not look like the person with images generated in Comfy UI vs Automatic1111. kinsel gtmaxe imtu wvwhpd xwehk swuphj pxpiu mgq akpv evit